38 CFR Part 4 — 38 CFR § 4.79
Anatomical loss of both eyes — VA Diagnostic Code 6061
Eye
Diagnostic code
6061
38 CFR § 4.79, under Impairment of Central Visual Acuity, lists Diagnostic Code 6061 as “Anatomical loss of both eyes,” rated 100. Superscript 1 is on that row. Appendix B to Part 4, version date 2026-10-01, indexes this code as “Anatomical loss both eyes.” The index drops the word “of” and ends with a period. The rating-table row keeps “of” and does not end with a period.
Reviewed 2026-10-05. Text checked against the eCFR versioner full-text XML for 2026-10-01 on 2026-10-05. Title 38 was up to date as of 2026-10-01 and last amended on 2026-08-27. The § 4.79 source note prints 73 FR 66550, Nov. 10, 2008, as amended at 83 FR 15321, Apr. 10, 2018. The § 4.75 source note prints 73 FR 66549, Nov. 10, 2008. The § 4.76 source note prints 73 FR 66549, Nov. 10, 2008.
The rating criteria at each level
6061 Anatomical loss of both eyes — Impairment of Central Visual Acuity
Rating %: 100
Criteria (verbatim). Anatomical loss of both eyes
| Rating % | Criteria (verbatim) |
|---|---|
| 100 | Anatomical loss of both eyes |
Superscript 1 on the DC 6061 row reads: Review for entitlement to special monthly compensation under 38 CFR 3.350.
The same footnote marker is on DC 6062, no more than light perception in both eyes, which is also 100. The titles are different. DC 6061 does not print the measured-acuity rows that begin at DC 6063.
38 CFR § 4.75(f) says that when evaluating visual impairment, refer to 38 CFR 3.350 to determine whether the claimant may be entitled to special monthly compensation. Footnotes in the schedule indicate levels of visual impairment that potentially establish entitlement. 38 CFR § 3.350(d) is headed “Ratings under 38 U.S.C. 1114(n).” Paragraph (d)(4) reads: “Anatomical loss of both eyes or blindness without light perception in both eyes.” That sentence keeps the word “of.” It also names blindness without light perception, which is not the DC 6061 title and is not the DC 6062 title. DC 6062 says “No more than light perception in both eyes.” Section 3.350(c)(1)(iv) is a different sentence: “Blindness in both eyes having only light perception.” This page does not state a payment amount.
38 CFR § 4.76(b)(1) says to evaluate central visual acuity on the basis of corrected distance vision with central fixation, even if a central scotoma is present. DC 6061’s own row is the anatomical-loss line. It is not one cell of the later acuity pairs.
38 CFR § 4.31 says that in every instance where the schedule does not provide a zero percent evaluation for a diagnostic code, a zero percent evaluation shall be assigned when the requirements for a compensable evaluation are not met. DC 6061 prints one percentage, 100. 38 CFR § 4.7 assigns the higher rating when the disability picture more nearly approximates the criteria required for that rating. Otherwise, the lower rating will be assigned. 38 CFR § 4.6 requires each element affecting the evidence to be studied so that decisions will be equitable and just.
DC 6062 is the next row, also 100, with the same footnote marker. DC 6063 is anatomical loss of one eye, with a separate percentage for each listed acuity in the other eye.
Source: 38 CFR § 4.79, Diagnostic Code 6061, eCFR full-text XML for 2026-10-01. Appendix B to Part 4, same version date, is the index line quoted above.
What the words mean in your records
The index drops “of”
The § 4.79 row says “Anatomical loss of both eyes.” Appendix B says “Anatomical loss both eyes.” The percentage on the rating table is 100.
Superscript 1 sits on the row
Footnote 1 says to review special monthly compensation under 38 CFR 3.350. The 100 is the rating cell. The superscript is on the criteria cell.
One eye is DC 6063
DC 6063 begins “Anatomical loss of one eye:” and then lists the other eye. Those pairs are not printed on DC 6061.
Evidence that speaks to each level
The 100 percent row
What the rater needs to see. Findings the schedule places on “Anatomical loss of both eyes.”
Where that usually lives. The eye examination. Section 4.75(b) names a licensed optometrist or ophthalmologist for visual impairment.
The footnote
What the rater needs to see. The special-monthly-compensation review the footnote names under 38 CFR 3.350.
Where that usually lives. The same examination, read against § 3.350(d)(4).
VA’s public DBQ list, checked October 5, 2026, names “Eye Conditions” under Ophthalmological. The file is Eye Conditions.
The exam form
DC 6061 prints one rating line and a footnote. This page does not say the form replaces that line.
Related codes and how they interact
Light perception in both eyes is the next row.
DC 6062 is 100 for no more than light perception in both eyes. DC 6061 is 100 for anatomical loss of both eyes. Section 3.350(d)(4) names anatomical loss of both eyes or blindness without light perception in both eyes.
Secondary conditions and presumptions
The 2026-10-01 text of 38 CFR § 3.309 does not contain “anatomical” or “blindness.” The DC 6061 footnote points to § 3.350, not to § 3.309.
A separate question, when a presumption does not decide it, is a medical question on the facts under 38 CFR § 3.310. Paragraph (a) covers disability proximately due to or the result of a service-connected disease or injury. Paragraph (b) covers increase in severity and requires a medical baseline.
Short answers
What is the VA rating for anatomical loss of both eyes?
Diagnostic Code 6061 in 38 CFR § 4.79 is 100 for anatomical loss of both eyes. Education only. VA decides on the evidence.
Which special-monthly-compensation sentence names both eyes?
Section 3.350(d)(4), under the 38 U.S.C. 1114(n) heading, says “Anatomical loss of both eyes or blindness without light perception in both eyes.” This page does not state a payment amount.
FAQ
What does DC 6061 rate?
Under 38 CFR § 4.79, anatomical loss of both eyes is 100. Superscript 1 says to review for entitlement to special monthly compensation under 38 CFR 3.350. Education only.
Why does Appendix B drop the word “of”?
Appendix B, version date 2026-10-01, prints “Anatomical loss both eyes.” The rating table prints “Anatomical loss of both eyes.” The percentage on the rating table is 100.
Is anatomical loss of one eye DC 6061?
DC 6061 says both eyes. Anatomical loss of one eye is the DC 6063 heading, with a percentage for each listed acuity in the other eye.
Next steps
- Read the decision for DC 6061 or another central-visual-acuity code, and any § 3.350 finding.
- The free worksheet is a place to write the code, the findings, and the records you already have. It does not file a claim or protect a filing date. An accredited representative is at find a VSO.
- Other eye codes are on the eye diagnostic-code index.
Education only. Not legal or medical advice. My Claim Packet is not a VA-accredited representative and does not file claims. VA decides every claim on its own evidence.
Other codes in this body system
Nearby catalog entries in Eye, ordered by diagnostic code number. All Eye codes
- DC 6032Eyelids, loss of portion
- DC 6033Lens, crystalline, dislocation
- DC 6034Pterygium
- DC 6035Keratoconus
- DC 6036Status post corneal transplant
- DC 6040Diabetic retinopathy
- DC 6042Retinal dystrophy (including retinitis pigmentosa, wet or dry macular degeneration, early-onset macular degeneration, rod and/or cone dystrophy)
- DC 6046Post-chiasmal disorders
- DC 6062Blindness, both eyes, only light perception
- DC 6063Anatomical loss of one eye, other eye 5/200 (1.5/60)
- DC 6064Other Eye 10 200 3 60
- DC 6064Other Eye 15 200 4 5 60
- DC 6064Other Eye 20 200 6 60
- DC 6065Other Eye 20 100 6 30
- DC 6065Other Eye 20 50 6 15
- DC 6065Other Eye 20 70 6 21
Also: DC code lookup (tools) lists the same index in a compact layout.
Source: 38 CFR Part 4, Diagnostic Code 6061 • va.gov
⚠️ Important Disclaimer
This page provides general educational information based on public VA regulations and VA.gov resources. It is not legal or medical advice, and My Claim Packet is not a VA-accredited representative. Any worksheets or draft documents produced by the tools must be reviewed for accuracy and are not filed with VA for you. Ratings and service connection are decided case-by-case from the individual record. Consult a VA-accredited VSO, claims agent, attorney, or qualified clinician for help with your situation, and verify current rules using the linked official source.

