Sign in

38 CFR § 3.103(f) · Process

How to Read a VA Rating Decision Letter

By Jesse, Founder · Data validated on August 16, 2026 · 6 min read

My Claim Packet research note

38 CFR § 3.103(f) · Process

Checked against the official sources linked in this article. Educational information only.

The short answer

Assume you have the letter. This is not the complete-but-no-letter problem. 38 CFR § 3.103(f) lists what the written notice has to include: the issues adjudicated, a summary of the evidence, the laws used, any favorable findings, the element that was not met if the claim was denied, the criteria for service connection or the next higher evaluation if applicable, how to get the evidence, and the review options. Read those pieces in that order. The combined percentage is a result, not the argument.

What the letter is, and what it is not

The decision notice is VA's official call on the issues it adjudicated. 38 CFR § 3.103(a) gives every claimant the right to written notice of the decision, a hearing, and representation. § 3.103(b)(1) says the notice will clearly set forth the § 3.103(f) elements, plus hearing rights, representation rights, and how to start a Higher-Level Review, a supplemental claim, or a Board appeal.

It is not a novel. It is not a complete copy of your claims file. It is not a promise that the online status screen already explained the reasons. VA.gov says a grant letter will include the disability rating, the monthly payment amount, and the date payments start. The reasons live in the decision narrative.

If VA.gov says the claim is complete and you still have no letter, stop reading this and use the complete-but-no-letter checklist. This article assumes the PDF or the envelope is in your hand.

The actual rule

§ 3.103(f) requires, in the letter or the enclosures: the issues adjudicated; a summary of the evidence; a summary of the law; any favorable findings under § 3.104(c); the unmet element on a denial; the criteria for service connection or the next higher evaluation if applicable; how to access the evidence used; and the § 3.2500 review options.

§ 3.104(c) is the favorable-findings rule. A finding favorable to the claimant, made by a VA adjudicator or by the Board, is binding on later agency and Board adjudicators unless it is rebutted by evidence that identifies a clear and unmistakable error in that finding. A "finding" is a conclusion on a question of fact, or on an application of law to facts, concerning the issue under review.

§ 3.2500(a) is the review menu. Within one year from the date VA issues notice of a decision on a claim or issue, you may elect a Higher-Level Review or a Board appeal on the prescribed form. A supplemental claim under § 3.2501 may be filed at any time. Continuous pursuit, which protects the original effective-date chain, needs a timely filing in succession. See HLR vs supplemental vs Board.

What to look at, in order

Issues. List every condition VA says it decided. Grant, deny, defer, or continue. If a line is deferred, that line is not a decision. Do not appeal a deferred line. Wait for the later notice.

Codes and percentages. Write down the diagnostic code, the evaluation, the combined evaluation, and the effective date. Compare them to the percentages chart only after you understand the reasons.

Evidence list. § 3.103(f)(2) requires a summary of the evidence considered. Check whether your private DBQ, your buddy statement, and the C&P report are on that list. An item that never appears is an item you may need to raise later. An item that appears and gets ignored in the reasons is a different problem.

Reasons and bases. This is the argument. For a denial, § 3.103(f)(5) requires the element that was not met. Current disability, in-service event, and nexus are the usual three for direct service connection. For an evaluation, § 3.103(f)(6) should identify the criteria for the next higher level. If the letter never says which element failed, that is a notice problem.

Favorable findings. Do not skim this box. § 3.104(c) makes those findings binding later unless someone shows clear and unmistakable error in them. A favorable finding that the in-service injury happened, or that you have a current diagnosis, is the part you do not want to re-litigate by accident. A later supplemental claim or HLR should build on that finding, not pretend it does not exist.

Review options. § 3.103(f)(8) requires a summary of the § 3.2500 options. The letter should tell you the lanes and the forms. The one-year clock for HLR and Board review runs from the date of the notice, not from the day you opened the PDF.

What to challenge, without promising a grant

Challenge the issue that is actually wrong.

If the letter granted service connection at a lower evaluation than the criteria support, the fight is the evaluation and the missing criteria under § 3.103(f)(6). That is often an HLR if you are not adding evidence, or a supplemental claim if you have new treatment notes. See how to increase a rating when the condition has actually worsened after the decision.

If the letter denied service connection, identify the element VA said was missing. If the file already had that element and the reasons skipped it, that is an HLR argument. If you now have a new medical opinion or a new record, that is a supplemental claim.

If a favorable finding is sitting in the letter and the denial pretends the opposite, quote the favorable finding. § 3.104(c) is the citation.

If the exam was inadequate, that is a duty-to-assist problem. Raise it in the lane that fits. Do not just write "I disagree" and hope.

Mistakes to avoid

Reading only the first-page percentage. The reasons and the favorable findings are the part that decides the next move.

Appealing a deferred issue. It was not adjudicated.

Filing all three review lanes at once. § 3.2500(b) prohibits concurrent elections on the same issue.

Ignoring a favorable finding and starting from zero. That finding is binding unless CUE is shown.

FAQ

What does "reasons and bases" mean on a rating decision?

It is the explanation of why VA granted, denied, or assigned that evaluation. § 3.103(f) requires a summary of the evidence, the law, the missing element on a denial, and the criteria for the next higher level when that applies.

What is a favorable finding?

A conclusion of fact, or of law applied to facts, that helps you. § 3.104(c) makes it binding on later VA and Board adjudicators unless clear and unmistakable error in that finding is shown.

Can I appeal only one condition?

Yes. Review options run by claim or issue. § 3.2500; § 3.151(c).

How long do I have to request a Higher-Level Review or a Board appeal?

Within one year from the date VA issues notice of the decision, unless a narrower rule applies. § 3.2500(a)(1). A supplemental claim may be filed later, with a different effective-date result if you break continuous pursuit.

Primary sources

Educational only. Not legal or medical advice. Confirm against the veteran's actual notice and current eCFR / VA.gov. For claim-specific help, use a VA-accredited VSO, claims agent, or attorney.

Related reading

Choose your free next step

Preview a five-question educational plan now, or get the printable Secondary Conditions Checklist by email.

Preview my claim plan
or email the checklist

Want to save this and export a packet later? That's the $59 pass.